Posts
Liar, liar, pants on fire, if you were a politician, your nose would grow longer than all the cable wire that surrounds the globe.
On November 17, 1973, in denying involvement in the Watergate scandal, President Richard Nixon insisted, “Well, I’m not a crook.” Worse than a lie, rather than face certain impeachment, on August 9, 1974, he became the only U.S. President to resign from office. Long before, in the 1950 mid-term elections, Democratic opponent for the U.S. Senate seat in California, then-Representative Helen Gahagan Douglas, foresaw his questionable integrity when she nicknamed him “Tricky Dick.”
On August 18, 1998, during his acceptance speech as presidential nominee at the Republican National Convention, George H. W. Bush bespoke, “Read my lips – no new taxes.” In January, 1990, he implemented a $4 billion a year payroll tax increase. Although he later stated that “I did it, and I regret and I regret it”, Bill Clinton won the 1992 Presidential Election.
In a deposition on the Paula Jones lawsuit, President Bill Clinton swore, “I have never had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky. I’ve never had an affair with her.” Indeed, pants on fire, you liar! Impeached by the House of Representatives on December, 19, 1998, he was acquitted of perjury, obstruction of justice and malfeasance in office by the Senate on February 12, 1999.
The Center for Public Integrity claims that President George W. Bush “made 234 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and another 28 false statement about Iraq’s links to Al Qaeda.” To support these allegations, the group cited reports from “the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (2004 and 2006), the 9/11 Commission, and the multinational Iraq Survey Group, whose "Duelfer Report" established that Saddam Hussein had terminated Iraq's nuclear program in 1991 and made little effort to restart it.”
On many occasions during his presidency Bush was adamant that, as stated in November 2005, “This government does not torture people.” And that his administration adhered to "U.S. law and our international obligations." Going back to 2003, he claimed, “The United States is committed to the worldwide elimination of torture and we are leading this fight by example.” At the time, the administration used what they called “enhanced interrogation techniques”. And yet, on June 3, 2010, the former president admitted, “Yeah, we waterboarded Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. I'd do it again to save lives."
Enough about George W. Vice President Cheney was no truthsayer either, claiming in 2003, "I have no financial interest in Halliburton of any kind and haven't had now for over three years." In 2001, Cheney received a $34 million payout package; two years later Halliburton was rewarded one of the biggest federal contracts in history to take part in the Iraq war.
We pause for a moment from lying leaders to tread heavily on the man who epitomized the greedy excesses of Wall Street investors.
October 20, 2007, Bernie Madoff said, “In today’s regulatory environment, it’s virtually impossible to violate rules… but it’s impossible for a violation to go undetected, certainly not for a considerable period of time.” On December, 11, 2008, Madoff admitted, “It’s all just one big lie.” Upwards of $65 billion and tens of thousands of victims later, on June 29, 2009, U.S. District Judge Denny Chin, while sentencing the Ponzi schemer to 150 years in prison, decreed, “Mr. Madoff’s crimes were extremely evil.”
Recent government unemployment figures continue to be blatant lies. The June jobless rate was 9.5%, down from 9.7% in May but these figures don’t include some 652,000 people who gave up and stopped looking for work. If the truth was told, the June jobless rate would have been reported as rising to 9.9%.
The Obama administration claims the stimulus recovery package has created or saved between 2.5 to 3.6 million jobs when, in fact, the U.S. economy has lost a net 2.3 million jobs since the $862 million was pumped into the economy in February 2009.
On September 12, 2008, presidential candidate Barack Obama delivered a predictable lie, “I can make a firm pledge, under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.”
Then came health care reform. This past September, President Obama insisted, “For us to say that you’ve got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax.” Not surprisingly, in defense of mandating penalties for failing to carry ‘minimum essential coverage’, the Justice Department has stated the mandate is “a valid exercise” for Congress to exercise its taxing authority through the General Welfare Clause of the Constitution. So, a tax it is.
During this and all political seasons, keep in mind the infamous words by Adolf Hitler from Mein Kampf: “The great masses of the people will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one.”
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Breaking Up Bush Era Tax Cuts
The George W Bush tax cuts that have been in place for nearly a decade must come to an end and the end result must allow tax breaks to expire for individuals making in excess of $200K and couples earning over $250K.
Backtracking for a moment to the years between 1947 and 1973, household income of the middle 20% of Americans nearly doubled while the top 20% saw their incomes rise by a disproportionate, but still impressive, 85%. Since then, through 2006 the middle class saw their incomes rise by just 24% while top-tiered incomes nearly tripled. Since 2007 when the housing bubble popped, there has been a 36% drop in the wealth of the middle class. By contrast, the wealth of the top 1% saw a decline of just 11%.
Today, only 2% of Americans earn more than $250K, which is five times more than the rest of American workers. This means that 98% of us should rightfully be inclined to support the expiration of tax cuts to that very select group of money-makers.
Obstructionists to re-taxing readily the rich point out that the upper crust accounts for 30% of consumer spending which in itself exposes a reality that there is disparity of wealth in this county that relies too heavily on the affluent to keep the economy moving. In essence, this means that 2% of the populous have too great a deal of influence in the decisions made by Congress.
Who are among the rich and powerful who are adamant in maintaining their tax cuts? Might they not be lawyers, doctors, CEOs and CFOs and a few of their immediate underlings, inheritors of ‘old money’ and Wall Street investment manipulators? And how about politicians and their cohorts – lobbyists and campaign contributors? And highly compensated entertainers – actors, musicians and athletes?
Another point to be made is that, while ‘we’ rely on seasonal tax preparers to help us file our 1040 tax forms to report our miniscule incomes, ‘they’ employ on-hand tax lawyers to take advantage of the many loopholes in the tax codes. Not only that, but they also have tax shelters in offshore bank accounts.
No, I don’t buy-in to the alarms that by allowing tax cuts to expire for the rich will be detrimental to the recovery of the economy – the GDP may shrink by half a percentage point. What these pretentious claimants portend to be true are not so. They are not in the same grievous financial straits as the rest of us.
On one account, the upper echelon is drawing back from spending. Instead, in many instances they are hoarding their moneys just as have corporations and banking institutions. So there goes a good chunk of the reported 30% of consumer spending, thus hindering economic growth.
There have been a number of contradictory news items that have gotten my dander up to upper atmospheric proportions.
In The Tampa Tribune Business section on July 24, in an article from the Orlando Sentinel, American Express Business Insights reported “ultra-affluent” cardholders, which are those who charge a minimum of $84,000 per year, increased their spending at theme parks by nearly 32% in the first quarter of 2010; there was a 1% increase by the rest of the company’s cardholders. The article also stated that Walt Disney World has begun presales of homes priced as high as $8M in the “Golden Oaks” residential development project. Interested parties readily “plunk down $25K just to get their names on a priority reservation list.”
Another shocker to my sensibilities was an insert in the June 27 Sunday edition of The New York Times. It came in the form of what I viewed as an “Atlas of Adventures”, a 167-page advertisement catalogue issued by Regent Seven Seas Cruises titled “Winter Collection – September 2010 to May 2011”.
The many discount offers included a 7-day cruise in the Western Caribbean with a 2-for-1 fare deal in a Deluxe Suite (356 sq ft including a 50 sq ft balcony) priced as $4,365 per person including free air fare and unlimited shore excursions (usually $89 to $99). It’s quite a deal considering the normal rate is $8,595/person plus air fare. On the higher end, $9,865/person (usually $19,565/person plus air fare) would provide the vacationer a Master Suite (1403 sq ft with a 187 sq ft balcony).
In comparison, a similar 7-day cruise aboard a Princes Cruises ship is priced from $749 (interior room/160 sq ft) to $1,149 (master suite with balcony/461 to 687 sq ft). No 2-for-1 fare offers; no freebee shore excursions but well within the means if many of the 98% of Americans.
For the most affluent, Regency offers the Full Discovery Collection, a 75-night cruise leaving from Istanbul and disembarking in Fort Lauderdale. The basic Deluxe Suite ($301 sq ft/49 sq ft balcony) cost $37,150 per person (usually $81,995 per person plus air fare). A Master Suite (2001 sq ft/71 sq ft balcony) costs $127,650 (usually $262,995 plus air fare).
It’s estimated that by extending the tax cuts to all American taxpayers would ‘cost’ the government over $2 trillion in unrealized tax revenues over the next decade. Broken down, $1.5 trillion would come from ‘us 98%’ and $800 billion from ‘those 2%’. Most middle and low income earners need the continuation of the tax cuts just to catch up on past due bills and for the basic necessities to maintain their social status – extending their tax cuts may also allow them to increase their discretionary spending, a known boost to the economy.
The $800 billion of re-found revenues to the federal government could be used to reduce the federal deficit. But, in my opinion, these funds might be better spent as an investment for job creation, a faithless goal of the Obama administration. The economic foundation of American has been built in large part by small businesses. They are the vehicle that can spur the economy by getting Americans back to work. Re-employed laborers will not only garner newfound wages, thus allowing them to spend rather than just survive through austerity measures, but would also bring in added tax revenues and take them off unemployment payrolls.
Tax breaks given to small business should not be a give-away; guidelines would need to be in place to guarantee the intended results, such as verifiable new employment over a period of a full year.
It appears that Republicans as a whole and a few stray Democrats will stalemate attempts to bring to an end tax cuts to the rich; it will be an all-or-nothing ‘compromise’ to extend or expire the tax cuts at every income level. This would be poor governance for the average American.
Regardless of the action or inaction of Congress, the acrimonious rich will never associate lower class American citizens as ‘we the people’ but, instead, look down upon us as ‘you, the little people’.
Backtracking for a moment to the years between 1947 and 1973, household income of the middle 20% of Americans nearly doubled while the top 20% saw their incomes rise by a disproportionate, but still impressive, 85%. Since then, through 2006 the middle class saw their incomes rise by just 24% while top-tiered incomes nearly tripled. Since 2007 when the housing bubble popped, there has been a 36% drop in the wealth of the middle class. By contrast, the wealth of the top 1% saw a decline of just 11%.
Today, only 2% of Americans earn more than $250K, which is five times more than the rest of American workers. This means that 98% of us should rightfully be inclined to support the expiration of tax cuts to that very select group of money-makers.
Obstructionists to re-taxing readily the rich point out that the upper crust accounts for 30% of consumer spending which in itself exposes a reality that there is disparity of wealth in this county that relies too heavily on the affluent to keep the economy moving. In essence, this means that 2% of the populous have too great a deal of influence in the decisions made by Congress.
Who are among the rich and powerful who are adamant in maintaining their tax cuts? Might they not be lawyers, doctors, CEOs and CFOs and a few of their immediate underlings, inheritors of ‘old money’ and Wall Street investment manipulators? And how about politicians and their cohorts – lobbyists and campaign contributors? And highly compensated entertainers – actors, musicians and athletes?
Another point to be made is that, while ‘we’ rely on seasonal tax preparers to help us file our 1040 tax forms to report our miniscule incomes, ‘they’ employ on-hand tax lawyers to take advantage of the many loopholes in the tax codes. Not only that, but they also have tax shelters in offshore bank accounts.
No, I don’t buy-in to the alarms that by allowing tax cuts to expire for the rich will be detrimental to the recovery of the economy – the GDP may shrink by half a percentage point. What these pretentious claimants portend to be true are not so. They are not in the same grievous financial straits as the rest of us.
On one account, the upper echelon is drawing back from spending. Instead, in many instances they are hoarding their moneys just as have corporations and banking institutions. So there goes a good chunk of the reported 30% of consumer spending, thus hindering economic growth.
There have been a number of contradictory news items that have gotten my dander up to upper atmospheric proportions.
In The Tampa Tribune Business section on July 24, in an article from the Orlando Sentinel, American Express Business Insights reported “ultra-affluent” cardholders, which are those who charge a minimum of $84,000 per year, increased their spending at theme parks by nearly 32% in the first quarter of 2010; there was a 1% increase by the rest of the company’s cardholders. The article also stated that Walt Disney World has begun presales of homes priced as high as $8M in the “Golden Oaks” residential development project. Interested parties readily “plunk down $25K just to get their names on a priority reservation list.”
Another shocker to my sensibilities was an insert in the June 27 Sunday edition of The New York Times. It came in the form of what I viewed as an “Atlas of Adventures”, a 167-page advertisement catalogue issued by Regent Seven Seas Cruises titled “Winter Collection – September 2010 to May 2011”.
The many discount offers included a 7-day cruise in the Western Caribbean with a 2-for-1 fare deal in a Deluxe Suite (356 sq ft including a 50 sq ft balcony) priced as $4,365 per person including free air fare and unlimited shore excursions (usually $89 to $99). It’s quite a deal considering the normal rate is $8,595/person plus air fare. On the higher end, $9,865/person (usually $19,565/person plus air fare) would provide the vacationer a Master Suite (1403 sq ft with a 187 sq ft balcony).
In comparison, a similar 7-day cruise aboard a Princes Cruises ship is priced from $749 (interior room/160 sq ft) to $1,149 (master suite with balcony/461 to 687 sq ft). No 2-for-1 fare offers; no freebee shore excursions but well within the means if many of the 98% of Americans.
For the most affluent, Regency offers the Full Discovery Collection, a 75-night cruise leaving from Istanbul and disembarking in Fort Lauderdale. The basic Deluxe Suite ($301 sq ft/49 sq ft balcony) cost $37,150 per person (usually $81,995 per person plus air fare). A Master Suite (2001 sq ft/71 sq ft balcony) costs $127,650 (usually $262,995 plus air fare).
It’s estimated that by extending the tax cuts to all American taxpayers would ‘cost’ the government over $2 trillion in unrealized tax revenues over the next decade. Broken down, $1.5 trillion would come from ‘us 98%’ and $800 billion from ‘those 2%’. Most middle and low income earners need the continuation of the tax cuts just to catch up on past due bills and for the basic necessities to maintain their social status – extending their tax cuts may also allow them to increase their discretionary spending, a known boost to the economy.
The $800 billion of re-found revenues to the federal government could be used to reduce the federal deficit. But, in my opinion, these funds might be better spent as an investment for job creation, a faithless goal of the Obama administration. The economic foundation of American has been built in large part by small businesses. They are the vehicle that can spur the economy by getting Americans back to work. Re-employed laborers will not only garner newfound wages, thus allowing them to spend rather than just survive through austerity measures, but would also bring in added tax revenues and take them off unemployment payrolls.
Tax breaks given to small business should not be a give-away; guidelines would need to be in place to guarantee the intended results, such as verifiable new employment over a period of a full year.
It appears that Republicans as a whole and a few stray Democrats will stalemate attempts to bring to an end tax cuts to the rich; it will be an all-or-nothing ‘compromise’ to extend or expire the tax cuts at every income level. This would be poor governance for the average American.
Regardless of the action or inaction of Congress, the acrimonious rich will never associate lower class American citizens as ‘we the people’ but, instead, look down upon us as ‘you, the little people’.
Thursday, July 8, 2010
God, bless America.
Seven days ago America celebrated the 234th anniversary of the signing of The Declaration of Independence. No rocket’s red glare. Just fireworks bursting in air.
As for myself, I started the day late, having slept nearly twelve hours before rising about one o’clock in the afternoon. No. I hadn’t had a night of binge drinking. No taking of ‘enhancement’ drugs. It was a day of rest, pure and simple.
Once up, coffee and newspapers filled but a short period of the day. I was disappointed in, not what I read, but what wasn’t there to be read. Neither The Tampa Tribune nor The New York Times delivered to me a recap and up-to-date in-depth analyses of The Recovery Prevention Act of 2010.
The final bill, if passed by the Senate, will be a misnomer. We will never ‘recover’ the billions of taxpayer dollars that have been thrown at the feet of Wall Street investment manipulators with their Gucci shoes and their matching arrogant attitudes. Nor will the bill guarantee us a ‘prevention’ of another bailout meltdown.
By two-thirty, I set in motion a plan to make the evening an enjoyable get-together with a dinner and a movie. Blockbuster came first. It was a quick in-and-out visit as Season Two, Episodes 3 & 4 of ‘True Blood’ had already been chosen.
In a chipper mood, I shopped at Publix to pick out some USDA premium choice New York strip steaks, baking potatoes, sweet corn and salad fixings. At $10.99/pound, and a half-pound per serving, it was to be a beefed-up meal of contentment, which it was.
While in the produce section, there was a disturbance from a woman who had a few choice words with a young man by her side, presumably her son. I don’t know what the argument was about but she did the right thing by walking away. All of a sudden the kid, a very big boy, was in my face kindly inquiring if I was going to pay cash for my purchases. I hadn’t planned on it but he offered me a deal I couldn’t refuse. He would use a food stamp debit card to pay for my food purchases and I’d give him cash, fifty-cents to the dollar.
I’d heard of people getting this same exchange rate but this was my first time reaping the benefits of someone dependent on the entitlement program. After all was said and done, the total food bill was $58. After handing over $30, we were both happy fellows.
The meal was perfect, the steaks grilled to everyone’s delight. The DVD was as enjoyable as expected. The only fireworks we saw were those in the neighborhood. Someone complained about the smell of sulfur to which I countered with comments that questioned, “What did they think was in the air during the Revolution? Rose-scented potpourri? What about the smell of death and the cries of agony from wounded Patriots?” Point made.
‘The Capitol Fourth’ on PBS and ‘Macy’s 4th of July Fireworks’ on NBC were recorded and watched over the next two evenings. The latter was totally commercialized, the former truly spectacular. As I watched, I thought about the trade surplus with China, greenhouse gases and at what cost to taxpayers was ‘The Capitol Fourth’? Regardless, the sense of patriotism, freedom and the expressed appreciation of the men and women who have died to preserve the tenets of The Declaration of Independence made me feel proud to be an American. The afterglow was short-lived.
Just this week the Justice Department filed suit against Arizona’s new immigration law. This highlighted Arizona Governor Janice Brewer’s June 30 announcement of the cancellation of the Sept. 8-10 Border Governors Conference after other member states threatened to boycott the event in protest of the new law. Member states are Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas, not to mention Baja California, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo Leon, Sonora and Tamaulipas.
Also in DOJ news, ‘the right’ has focused attention on Election Day 2008 when two members of the New Black Panther Party for Self Defense intimidated white Philadelphia voters with racial slurs while dressed in militia garb; one wielded a billy-club/nightstick.
After the election, the DOJ filed a suit against the NBPP but it was dismissed on May 15, 2009, citing “the evidence did not support” the case. DOJ attorney J. Christian Adams resigned with allegations that under Attorney General Eric Holder there is a “profound hostility by the Obama Civil Rights Division in the Justice Department towards a race-neutral enforcement of civil rights laws.”
The jobless are still left without unemployment benefits. States remain underfunded for Medicaid. The Gulf of Mexico gusher is still spewing. Nearly half the states have joined the lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. We have yet to see how the Senate chokes on the American Clean Energy and Security Act. International affairs have never been worse.
God, bless America.
As for myself, I started the day late, having slept nearly twelve hours before rising about one o’clock in the afternoon. No. I hadn’t had a night of binge drinking. No taking of ‘enhancement’ drugs. It was a day of rest, pure and simple.
Once up, coffee and newspapers filled but a short period of the day. I was disappointed in, not what I read, but what wasn’t there to be read. Neither The Tampa Tribune nor The New York Times delivered to me a recap and up-to-date in-depth analyses of The Recovery Prevention Act of 2010.
The final bill, if passed by the Senate, will be a misnomer. We will never ‘recover’ the billions of taxpayer dollars that have been thrown at the feet of Wall Street investment manipulators with their Gucci shoes and their matching arrogant attitudes. Nor will the bill guarantee us a ‘prevention’ of another bailout meltdown.
By two-thirty, I set in motion a plan to make the evening an enjoyable get-together with a dinner and a movie. Blockbuster came first. It was a quick in-and-out visit as Season Two, Episodes 3 & 4 of ‘True Blood’ had already been chosen.
In a chipper mood, I shopped at Publix to pick out some USDA premium choice New York strip steaks, baking potatoes, sweet corn and salad fixings. At $10.99/pound, and a half-pound per serving, it was to be a beefed-up meal of contentment, which it was.
While in the produce section, there was a disturbance from a woman who had a few choice words with a young man by her side, presumably her son. I don’t know what the argument was about but she did the right thing by walking away. All of a sudden the kid, a very big boy, was in my face kindly inquiring if I was going to pay cash for my purchases. I hadn’t planned on it but he offered me a deal I couldn’t refuse. He would use a food stamp debit card to pay for my food purchases and I’d give him cash, fifty-cents to the dollar.
I’d heard of people getting this same exchange rate but this was my first time reaping the benefits of someone dependent on the entitlement program. After all was said and done, the total food bill was $58. After handing over $30, we were both happy fellows.
The meal was perfect, the steaks grilled to everyone’s delight. The DVD was as enjoyable as expected. The only fireworks we saw were those in the neighborhood. Someone complained about the smell of sulfur to which I countered with comments that questioned, “What did they think was in the air during the Revolution? Rose-scented potpourri? What about the smell of death and the cries of agony from wounded Patriots?” Point made.
‘The Capitol Fourth’ on PBS and ‘Macy’s 4th of July Fireworks’ on NBC were recorded and watched over the next two evenings. The latter was totally commercialized, the former truly spectacular. As I watched, I thought about the trade surplus with China, greenhouse gases and at what cost to taxpayers was ‘The Capitol Fourth’? Regardless, the sense of patriotism, freedom and the expressed appreciation of the men and women who have died to preserve the tenets of The Declaration of Independence made me feel proud to be an American. The afterglow was short-lived.
Just this week the Justice Department filed suit against Arizona’s new immigration law. This highlighted Arizona Governor Janice Brewer’s June 30 announcement of the cancellation of the Sept. 8-10 Border Governors Conference after other member states threatened to boycott the event in protest of the new law. Member states are Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas, not to mention Baja California, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo Leon, Sonora and Tamaulipas.
Also in DOJ news, ‘the right’ has focused attention on Election Day 2008 when two members of the New Black Panther Party for Self Defense intimidated white Philadelphia voters with racial slurs while dressed in militia garb; one wielded a billy-club/nightstick.
After the election, the DOJ filed a suit against the NBPP but it was dismissed on May 15, 2009, citing “the evidence did not support” the case. DOJ attorney J. Christian Adams resigned with allegations that under Attorney General Eric Holder there is a “profound hostility by the Obama Civil Rights Division in the Justice Department towards a race-neutral enforcement of civil rights laws.”
The jobless are still left without unemployment benefits. States remain underfunded for Medicaid. The Gulf of Mexico gusher is still spewing. Nearly half the states have joined the lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. We have yet to see how the Senate chokes on the American Clean Energy and Security Act. International affairs have never been worse.
God, bless America.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)